Should Shawnee continue spending $30,000 to $50,000 a year to provide residents with tree debris drop-off sites after major storms?
April 25, 2012
Stephanie Meyer ( in Shawnee) says...
“Yes, it is important that the city provide a means for residents to dispose of storm debris in an efficient, economical manner.”
Ray Erlichman ( in Shawnee) says...
“This needs to be a budget item, planning for it just like snow removal. The possibility of a per-use fee should be considered.”
Satinder Hundal ( in Shawnee) says...
“I think it is a convenient service for folks and helps in quicker clean up of the city, but not necessary.”
Michael Sanders ( in Shawnee) says...
“Top cities use tax revenue to provide essential services for their citizens. Kudos to Shawnee for its environmentally responsible program for providing recycling sites for trees damaged by natural disasters.”
Angela Jeppesen ( in Shawnee) says...
“This is a needed service in keeping our neighborhoods clean. The alternative would create brush piles in back yards, attracting vermin, creating eyesores and dropping property values.”
Norge Jerome ( in Shawnee) says...
“Absolutely! This service assists us in maintaining the quality of life expected in Shawnee. My fellow senior citizens also consider this a needed service. Thanks, Shawnee!”
Gloria Bessenbacher ( in Shawnee) says...
“This expense must have been part of another budget line. If it has worked fine, why not leave it as it is?”
Comments
Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.
Sign in to comment
Or login with:
OpenID